Metastasis-free survival and patterns of distant metastatic disease after PSMA-PET-guided salvage radiotherapy in recurrent or persistent prostate cancer after prostatectomy - International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics

Metastasis-free survival and patterns of distant metastatic disease after PSMA-PET-guided salvage radiotherapy in recurrent or persistent prostate cancer after prostatectomy - International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics

redjournal.org

Metastasis-free survival and patterns of distant metastatic disease after PSMA-PET-guided salvage radiotherapy in recurrent or persistent prostate cancer after prostatectomy

Search for articles by this author

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is increasingly used to guide salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence/persistence after prostatectomy. This work examines (i) metastasis-free survival (MFS) following PSMA-PET guided sRT and (ii) the metastatic patterns on PSMA-PET images after sRT.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter (9 centers, 5 countries) study included patients referred for PSMA-PET due to recurrent/persistent disease after prostatectomy. Patients with distant metastases (DM) on PSMA-PET prior to sRT were excluded. Cox-regression was performed to assess the impact of clinical parameters on MFS. The distribution of PSMA-PET detected DM following sRT and their respective risk factors were analysed.

Results: All (n=815) patients received intensity-modulated RT to the prostatic fossa. In case of PET-positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLN-PET, n=275, 34%), pelvic lymphatics had been irradiated. Androgen deprivation therapy had been given in 251 (31%) patients. The median follow-up after sRT was 36 months. The 2-/4-year MFS following sRT were 93%/81%. In multivariate analysis the presence of PLN-PET was a strong predictor for MFS (HR=2.39, p<0.001). Following sRT, DM were detected by PSMA-PET in 128/198 (65%) patients and two metastatic patterns were observed: 43% had DM in sub diaphragmatic paraaortic LNs (abdominal-lymphatic) whereas 45% in bones, 9% in supra diaphragmatic LNs and 6% in visceral organs (distant). Two distinct signatures with risk factors for each pattern were identified.

Conclusion: MFS in our study is lower compared to previous studies, obviously due to the higher detection rate of DM in PSMA-PET after sRT. Thus, it remains unclear whether MFS is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in PSMA PET-staged patients in the post sRT setting. PLN-PET may be proposed as a new surrogate parameter predictive of MFS. Analysis of recurrence patterns in PET after sRT revealed risk factor signatures for two metastatic patterns (abdominal-lymphatic and distant), which may allow individualized sRT concepts in the future.


Footnotes

Author responsible for statistical analysis: Joerg Sahlmann; Email: sahlmann@imbi.uni-freiburg.de>

Conflicts of interest: CZ and JS received funding from the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). CZ received funding from Naslund Medical and the Klaus Tschira foundation as well as honoraria from Johnson and Johnson and Novocure, outside the submitted work. SAK reports grants from Viewray Inc. and honoraria from IBA Dosimetry, outside the submitted work. ME is named as an inventor on a patent application for 18F-rhPSMA-7.3, reports research support from Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd., and prior consulting activities for Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd., Novartis, Telix, Progenics, Bayer, Point Biopharma and Janssen, all outside the submitted work. WPF reports fees from SOFIE Bioscience (research funding), Janssen (consultant, speakers bureau), Calyx (consultant), Bayer (consultant, speakers bureau), and Parexel (image review) outside of the submitted work.

Funding: This work is part of the IMPRO-REC project of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)

Research data are stored in an institutional repository and will be shared upon request to the corresponding autho

Identification

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.048

Copyright

© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

ScienceDirect

Access this article on ScienceDirect

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating therapeutic sequencing in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient journey | Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

Actinium-225 Theranostics for Advanced Prostate Cancer:

The Other Patient: Care for the Caregivers