FDA approves Pylarify for diagnosis of advanced/recurrent forms of prostate cancer | THE "NEW" PROSTATE CANCER INFOLINK
FDA approves Pylarify for diagnosis of advanced/recurrent forms of prostate cancer | THE "NEW" PROSTATE CANCER INFOLINK: In ,a recent media release, Lantheus Holdings announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved the imaging agent known as piflufolastat F 18 Injection (also known as Pylarify® …
FDA approves Pylarify for diagnosis of advanced/recurrent forms of prostate cancer
Posted on May 31, 2021 by Sitemaster
In ,a recent media release, Lantheus Holdings announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved the imaging agent known as piflufolastat F 18 Injection (also known as Pylarify® or more commonly just “PyL”) as a PSMA-based PET imaging agent for identification of prostate cancer.
This agent is actually approved for use in two types of patient: men suspected of having either metastatic or recurrent forms of prostate cancer — even if there is no sign of metastasis on a bone or normal CT scan.
There are now four imaging agents that can be used with PET or of PET/CT scans to identify forms of prostate cancer that may not be easily visible on standard types of scan:
- The choline C-11 PET/CT scan, used primarily at the Mayo Clinic
- The Axumin-based PET/CT scan, which is now widely available in the US
- The gallium-68 PSMA-based PET scan, that is only available at a small number of academic centers and now
- This newly approved Pylarify-based PET scan
The question now is going to be whether any one of these tests is significantly better than the other three in definable subtypes of patient. At present there is little to no information to show this with accuracy, but Prostate Cancer International profoundly hopes that relevant trials can be conducted to explore this question.
The use of PET scanning in the management of prostate cancer is expensive and restricted to a limited number of centers. It is NOT a technique liable to be available widely in community treatment settings. It will NOT be in the interest of patients if we cannot reach earlky consensus on the most appropriate use of the best of these tests in the right patients.
Filed under: Diagnosis, Living with Prostate Cancer, Management, Risk | Tagged: imaging, PET scan, PyL, Pylarify |
Comments
Post a Comment