Any decline in prostate‐specific antigen levels identifies survivors scheduled for prostate‐specific membrane antigen‐directed radioligand therapy - Hartrampf - The Prostate - Wiley Online Library
Any decline in prostate‐specific antigen levels identifies survivors scheduled for prostate‐specific membrane antigen‐directed radioligand therapy - Hartrampf - The Prostate - Wiley Online Library: Background Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) is increasingly incorporated in the therapeutic algorithm of patients with metastatic castration-resistant pro...
Any decline in prostate‐specific antigen levels identifies survivors scheduled for prostate‐specific membrane antigen‐directed radioligand therapy
1 INTRODUCTION
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) has demonstrated convincing outcome benefits in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), rendering 177Lu-PSMA as an attractive treatment option in patients with advanced disease.1, 2 As a non-negligible portion of those patients do not adequately respond to therapy, early indicators of treatment failure, preferably after the first cycle, are intensively sought, thereby allowing to switch to another, more effective therapy early in the treatment course. In this regard, recent clinical trials defined response as >50% decline of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels,1-4 thereby following recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) 3.5 Other investigations, however, interpreted any PSA decline after one cycle as successful treatment.3, 6, 7 Given those varying definitions of early biochemical response in the context of RLT, we aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of those criteria (including any response and PSA response >50%) for overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients scheduled for 177Lu-labeled RLT.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Patient cohort
A total of 184 mCRPC patients treated with at least two cycles of PSMA-directed RLT at the University Hospitals of Würzburg ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T, n = 86) and Bonn ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, n = 98) were included in this bicentric, retrospective study (Table 1). Parts of these cohorts were previously reported in,8 without investigating different definitions of PSA response as a surrogate parameter for survival. The cohort was further stratified according to the classification of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) into subgroups of ISUP 1–3 and ISUP 4–5.9, 10 The need for approval was waived by the local ethical committee due to the retrospective nature of this analysis (20210422 04).
Entire cohort (n = 184) | [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n = 98) | [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (n = 86) | |
---|---|---|---|
Clinical variables | |||
Age at first cycle of PSMA RLT (years) | 71.0 (43.0–89.0) | 71.0 (43.0–86.0) | 71.0 (46.0–89.0) |
Treatment cycles per patient | 3 (2–10) | 3 (2–10) | 3 (2–9) |
Cumulative activity (GBq) | 19.0 (7.9–60.1) | 19.3 (7.9–60.1) | 18.5 (10.4–54.6) |
Activity per cycle (GBq) | 6.1 (3.8–12.4) | 6.1 (3.8–12.4) | 6.1 (3.9–6.8) |
Gleason score | 8 (6–10) | 8 (6–10) | 8 (6–10) |
Tumor volume (according to CHAARTED) | High: 161 | High: 91 | High: 70 |
Low: 23 | Low: 7 | Low: 16 | |
Baseline laboratory values | |||
PSA (ng/ml) | 163.0 (0.1–3130) | 178.5 (0.4–2600) | 157.5 (0.1–3130) |
Previous treatments (%) | |||
Radical prostatectomy | 44.0 | 43.9 | 44.2 |
Primary radiation therapy to the prostate | 16.3 | 16.3 | 16.3 |
Adjuvant radiation therapy | 17.4 | 14.3 | 20.9 |
Salvage radiation therapy | 12.0 | 9.2 | 15.1 |
Antihormonal treatment | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Enzalutamide | 70.7 | 70.4 | 70.9 |
Abiraterone | 67.9 | 65.3 | 70.9 |
Chemotherapy | 70.1 | 74.5 | 65.1 |
- Abbreviations: GBq, Gigabecquerel, PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
2.2 Treatment protocol
Standard institutional protocols were used to perform RLT. Labeling of PSMA ligands with [177Lu] was performed in-house and has been described elsewhere.8, 11 Treatment protocols at both study sites have also been described elsewhere8, 11 and included administration of approximately 6.0 GBq of PSMA ligands every 8 weeks with up to a maximum of 10 cycles, depending on treatment response.
2.3 Definitions of early biochemical response
Blood samples including PSA levels were collected before the first RLT (cycle 1, day 0) and after 8 weeks on the admission day for the second cycle (cycle 2, day 0). Relative changes in PSA levels were calculated, and response to treatment was defined either as any decline in PSA levels or decrease >50%. We then compared survival between responders and nonresponders (with OS including the time span between initiation of RLT and date of death).
2.4 Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism version 9.3.0 (GraphPad Software) was applied. We herein report on descriptive data as median and range in parentheses and we used Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank comparison to compare OS of responders and nonresponders. Median survival is presented in months with hazard ratio of death (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We considered a p value of less than 0.05 to be statistically significant.
3 RESULTS
3.1 Early biochemical response for the entire cohort
During a median follow-up of 10 (2–48) months, 116 patients died. The median OS after initiation of RLT was 16 (2–48) months. The median baseline PSA-value was 163 (0.1–3130) and the median PSA-value after the first cycle was 117 (0.07–2490). 55/184 (29.9%) patients showed a PSA response >50%. OS between patients with PSA response >50% (19 months) was significantly longer when compared to patients without PSA response >50% (13 months; HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44–0.93; p = 0.02). Applying the criterion of any PSA decline (range: 0.6–98.5%), 114/184 (62.0%) of patients were considered as treatment responders. Survival differences, however, were then more pronounced, with 19 months for responders and only 8 months for nonresponders (HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25–0.60; p < 0.001) (Figure 1). For 167 patients, Gleason score was available and these patients were stratified according to ISUP. Difference in OS between patients with PSA response >50% compared to patients without PSA response >50% was not significant in the ISUP 1–3 group (14 vs. 16 months; HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.47–1.97; p = 0.90) and reached significance in the ISUP 4–5 group (19 vs. 13 months; HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36–0.99; p = 0.04). Applying the criterion of any PSA decline, survival differences, were significant for the ISUP 1–3 cohort (18 vs. 5.5 months; HR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.07–0.48; p < 0.001) and the ISUP 4–5 cohort (19 vs. 9 months; HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20–0.60; p < 0.001; Figure 2).
3.2 Early biochemical response for patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617
Of 98 patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, 34 patients (34.7%) showed a PSA decrease >50%. OS in patients with PSA response >50% was 19 months, which was significantly longer than for patients without PSA response >50% (11 months; HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.37–0.98; p = 0.03). 64/98 (65.3%) patients showed any PSA decline (range: 0.6–98.5%) and survival differences were then again more pronounced for patients with any PSA decline (19 months) when compared to patients without any PSA decline (7 months; HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.24–0.82; p < 0.001; Figure 3).
3.3 Early biochemical response for patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T
Of 86 patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T, 21 patients (24.4%) had a PSA response >50%. OS in patients with PSA response >50% (18 months) was not significantly different to those without PSA response >50% (14 months; HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.35–1.14; p = 0.15). 50/86 (58.1%) patients had any PSA decline (range: 0.7–93.8%) and significance for OS was achieved for patients with any PSA decline (20 months) when compared to patients without any PSA decline (9 months; HR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.17–0.61; p < 0.001; Figure 4).
4 DISCUSSION
To date, definitions of early biochemical response in the context of RLT is not consistently clarified and varies from PSA decline of >50%1-4 to any decrease in PSA levels.3, 6, 7 Comparing both definitions, the latter criterion better separated between survivors and non-survivors, thereby indicating that any PSA decline may serve as a more reliable surrogate parameter for long-term outcome. As such, irrespective of the magnitude of PSA decline, RLT should be continued if early serologic assessments indicate a PSA drop. Of note, this also applied to patients stratified according to ISUP.
As a substantial portion of mCRPC patients do not respond to RLT, assessment of early biochemical response using PSA levels is commonly applied during follow-up.1-4 Established criteria, such as the PCWG3, recommend analysis of PSA changes 12 weeks after initiating treatment.5 Earlier assessments, however, have also been tested in the context of PSMA-RLT,6, 7, 12 with significant correlations between OS and PSA decline as early as 4 weeks after therapy.12 We, therefore, analyzed changes in PSA levels as early as 8 weeks after the first cycle of RLT, thereby investigating a time frame that would still allow to alter treatment if necessary and if other treatment options are still available as PSMA-RLT is often used as last line treatment. In this regard, the herein observed response rates of 62.0% for any response and 29.9% for PSA response >50% are comparable to previous studies,6, 7, 13 rendering our results applicable to a real-world scenario. Differences in OS between survivors and nonsurvivors, however, were more pronounced in patients with any PSA decline when compared to PSA response >50% for the entire cohort. In addition, any PSA response, but not PCWG3 definition, reached significance in a subanalysis investigating patients only treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T or [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Those findings are consistent with a previous study reporting on 27 mCRPC patients receiving the latter agent. In this study, the PCWG3 recommended threshold of 50% PSA decline did not correlate with survival, while lower PSA deltas 4 weeks after treatment on-set were linked to late biochemical response at week 17 and longer OS.12 Including a substantially larger number of patients treated with the most commonly administered RLT agents, our study provides further evidence that early biochemical response is tightly linked to prolonged survival, irrespective of the magnitude of PSA decline and thus, even in patients not meeting the strict criteria of the PCWG3, RLT should be continued. It is also of interest, that the OS in patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T and not responding according to PSA criteria, still show a tendency for a longer OS than patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. In detail, this means 9 compared to 7 months in case of PSA increase and 14 compared to 11 months for patients with PSA decrease less than 50% or a PSA increase.
The limitations of the present analysis include its retrospective nature. Further studies in a prospective setting are needed to corroborate our findings, e.g., to assess the predictive capability of any PSA decline at a later time-point (cycle 3 day 0). Nonetheless, we focused on early biochemical response at cycle 2 day 0, thereby providing decision-support for the practitioner to switch therapy already at a very early stage in the treatment course.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: Philipp E. Hartrampf, Rudolf A. Werner, Andreas K. Buck, Andreas K. Buck; Methodology: Franz-Xaver Weinzierl; Software: Franz-Xaver Weinzierl; Validation: Philipp E. Hartrampf, Rudolf A. Werner, Andreas K. Buck; Formal analysis: Philipp E. Hartrampf, Franz-Xaver Weinzierl, Andreas K. Buck; Investigation: Philipp E. Hartrampf, Andreas K. Buck, Franz-Xaver Weinzierl; Resources: Andreas K. Buck, Markus Essler; data curation, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Franz-Xaver Weinzierl; Writing—original draft preparation: Philipp E. Hartrampf, Rudolf A. Werner, Andreas K. Buck; Writing—review and editing: Rudolf A. Werner, Andreas K. Buck, Andreas K. Buck, Anna Katharina Seitz, Markus Essler, Hubert Kübler; Visualization: Franz-Xaver Weinzierl, Philipp E. Hartrampf; Supervision: Rudolf A. Werner, Andreas K. Buck; Project administration: Philipp E. Hartrampf, Rudolf A. Werner, Andreas K. Buck, Andreas K. Buck; Funding acquisition: Philipp E. Hartrampf. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the IZKF Wuerzburg (grant Z-02/85 to P.E.H.). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Ralph A. Bundschuh is Consultant for Bayer Healthcare (Leverkusen, Germany) and Eisai GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany). Ralph A. Bundschuh has a noncommercial research agreement and is on the speakers list of Mediso Medical Imaging (Budapest, Hungary). Markus Essler is Consultant for Bayer Healthcare (Leverkusen, Germany), Eisai GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany), IPSEN and Novartis.
ETHICS STATEMENT
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study by the local Ethics Committee due to the retrospective character of the study (#20210422 04). All procedures have been conducted as part of clinical routine care. Informed consent has been obtained from all subjects.
REFERENCES
Comments
Post a Comment