Real‐world utilization, patient characteristics, and treatment patterns among men with localized prostate cancer tested with the 17‐gene genomic prostate score® (GPSTM) assay - Nguyen - The Prostate - Wiley Online Library


Real‐world utilization, patient characteristics, and treatment patterns among men with localized prostate cancer tested with the 17‐gene genomic prostate score® (GPSTM) assay - Nguyen - The Prostate - Wiley Online Library

First published: 26 April 2024

Abstract

Objectives

Descriptive study focusing on real-world utilization and characteristics of men with prostate cancer tested with the 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score® (GPS™) assay by linking administrative claims and electronic health record (EHR) data with GPS results.

Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020) included men aged 40–80 years with localized prostate cancer claims, continuous enrollment in Optum's Integrated Claims data set, ≥1 day of EHR clinical activity, and a GPS result. Men were classified as undergoing definitive therapy (DT) (prostatectomy, radiation, or focal therapy) or active surveillance (AS). AS and DT distribution were analyzed across GPS results, National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) risk, and race. Costs were assessed 6 months after the first GPS result (index); clinical outcomes and AS persistence were assessed during the variable follow-up. All variables were analyzed descriptively.

Results

Of 834 men, 650 (77.9%) underwent AS and 184 (22.1%) DT. Most men had Quan-Charlson comorbidity scores of 1–2 and a tumor stage of T1c (index). The most common Gleason patterns were 3 + 3 (79.6%) (AS cohort) and 3 + 4 (55.9%) (DT cohort). The mean (standard deviation) GPS results at index were 23.2 (11.3) (AS) and 30.9 (12.9) (DT). AS decreased with increasing GPS result and NCCN risk. Differences between races were minimal. Total costs were substantially higher in the DT cohort.

Conclusions

Most men with GPS-tested localized prostate cancer underwent AS, indicating the GPS result can inform clinical management. Decreasing AS with increasing GPS result and NCCN risk suggests the GPS complements NCCN risk stratification.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST STATEMENT

A. M. N.: Employee of Optum, which received funding from Exact Sciences to conduct this study. G. C. C.: Employee of Exact sciences with stock holdings. L.-A. M. W.: Employee of Exact Sciences with stock holdings. S. C.: Exact Science, Pfizer, Astellas, Lantheus, Nanospectra.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A 10-Second Steam Blast: The New Weapon Against Prostate Cancer?

Researchers develop low-cost device that detects cancer in an hour | ScienceDaily

Cancer patients and doctors team up to change how cancer drugs are tested | Fox News